Skip to main content

Table 6 Comparison of percentage of participants giving correct responses to the main consent components in the intervention and standard group, WukiroKilte-Awulaelo and Hintal-wajiratworedas(districts), Tigray region, Northern Ethiopia, July 2013

From: Cluster randomized trial assessing the effects of rapid ethical assessment on informed consent comprehension in a low-resource setting

Consent component

Mean % CS Intervention N = 114)

Mean % CS Control (N = 85)

Mean difference (95 % CI)

P

Disease information [Q302]

67.54

51.77

15.8 (2.1, 29.5)

2.4

Information about the study[Q201, 203, 204, 208]

55.26

37.64

17.6 (9.46, 25.76)

<0.001

Aim /purpose of the study[Q308A, 308B]

79.38

51.76

27.62 (19.53, 35.70)

<0.001

Selection criteria [Q301]

99.12

78.82

20.30 (12.50, 28.10)

<0.001

Procedure of sample collection [Q310A, 310C]

93.86

61.18

32.68 (25.21, 40.86)

<0.001

Tasks to be performed by participants [Q311A]

98.25

83.53

14.70 (7.30, 22.20)

<0.001

Risk of the study/ side effect of sample collection [Q312A, 312B]

52.19

37.65

14.55 (4.05, 25.04)

0.007

Benefit of the study [Q206, 207,209, 309C]

68.20

29.71

38.50 (29.38, 47.61)

<0.001

Confidentiality [Q205, 213]

76.75

65.29

11.46 (2.21, 20.71)

0.015

Participant right [Q202, 210, 212, 304, 305, 306]

70.32

27.64

42.67 (36.35, 48.99)

<0.001

Summary comprehension score

aUnderstanding

73.01

45.61

27.40 (22.60, 32.19)

<0.001

bRecall

73.16

44.78

28.37 (23.34, 33.40)

<0.001

Over all C- score

73.09

45.17

27.92 (23.97, 31.87)

<0.001

  1. aUnderstanding -score of Q201, 202, 205, 209, 210, 211, 212, 213, 301, 304, 305, 306, 307
  2. bRecall- score of Q 203, 204, 206, 207, 208, 302, 303, 308A, 308B, 309C, 310A, 310C, 311A, 312A, 312B