Skip to main content

Table 1 Criteria and outcome categories of GuidelineWatch

From: Management of financial conflicts of interests in clinical practice guidelines in Germany: results from the public database GuidelineWatch

Criterion

Outcome

1. Declaration and assessment of COI

A

No declaration statement

B

Undetailed declaration (yes/no)

C

Detailed declaration stating companies

D

Detailed declaration and external evaluation of COI (as opposed to self-assessment of the relevance of COI)

2. Composition of the guideline group

A

Lack of declarations

B

More than 50% with financial COI

C

25 to 50% with COI

D

Less than 25% with COI

E

All participants with full declarations and without COI

3. Independence of the coordinators and lead authors

A

Lack of declarations

B

All coordinators/lead authors with COI

C

Some of the coordinators/lead authors with COI

D

All coordinators/lead authors with full declarations and without COI

4. Abstentions in participants with COI

A

No rule for abstentions

B

Rule for abstentions, but no factual abstentions or voting results not documented

C

Partial abstentions

D

Fully documented abstentions of participants with COI

5. External public review

A

No external review

B

External review on a publicly accessible website, not fully documented

C

External review and documented handling of the individual comments