Skip to main content

Table 1 Demographic, professional and personal characteristics of the study population, as a whole and per country

From: Culture and personal influences on cardiopulmonary resuscitation- results of international survey

Characteristic

Category

Israel n (%a)

Indonesia n (%a)

Mexico n (%a)

Total n (%a)

p value

Gender

Male

131 (65.5%)

186 (63.9%)

67 (59.8%)

384 (63.7%)

0.602

Religion

Jewish

162 (83.1%)

0

0

162 (26.9%)

N/A

Muslim

16 (8.2%)

173 (58.8%)

0

189 (31.4%)

Christian

8 (4.1%)

95 (32.3%)

106 (93.8%)

209 (34.7%)

Other

9 (4.6%)

26 (8.8%)

7 (6.2%)

42 (7.0%)

Degree of religiosity

Secular

132 (65.3%)

176 (60.3%)

60 (53.6%)

368 (60.7%)

0.222

Observant

35 (17.3%)

48 (16.4%)

25 (22.3%)

108 (17.8%)

Religious/orthodox

35 (17.3%)

68 (23.3%)

27 (24.1%)

130 (21.5%)

Parental status

Not a parent

38 (18.9%)

42 (14.4%)

24 (21.4)

104 (17.2%)

0.185

Has children

163 (81.1%)

249 (85.6%)

88 (78.6%)

500 (82.8%)

Medical specialty

Anesthesiology, Intensive Care and Emergency medicine

110 (54.7%)

178 (61.2%)

79 (71.8%)

367 (61.0%)

0.006

Otherb

91 (45.3%)

113 (38.8%)

31 (28.2%)

235 (39.0%)

Time of last ACLS course

Never or more than 2 years

140 (69.0%)

201 (68.0%)

53 (47.3%)

394 (64.9%)

<  0.001

Less than 2 years

63 (31.0%)

91 (31.2%)

59 (52.7%)

213 (35.1%)

Prefer to avoid risks

Disagree

52 (26.1%)

79 (27.1%)

45 (40.2%)

176 (29.2%)

0.042

Agree or don’t know

147 (73.9%)

213 (72.9%)

67 (59.8%)

427 (70.8%)

Continuous variables

Israel Med (IQR, min-max)

Indonesia Med (IQR, min-max)

Mexico Med (IQR, min-max)

Total Med (IQR, min-max)

p value

 

Age (years)

40 (16, 26–69)

39 (17, 26–78)

37 (16, 25–78)

39 (17, 25–78)

0.955

 

Years practicing medicine

13 (18, 1–44)

11 (17, 1–44)

11 (17, 2–44)

12 (18, 1–44)

0.619

 

Years practicing emergency medicine

3 (11, 0–32)

3 (9, 0–32)

2 (3, 0–32)

3 (9, 0–32)

0.092

 

Knowledge score (Scale 1–5)

2 (1, 1–5)

2 (1, 1–5)

3 (1, 1–4)

2 (1, 1–5)

0.979

 

Patient oriented assessment of the preference for sanctity vs. quality of life1 (Scale 1–5)

3 (2, 1–5)

3 (2, 1–5)

3 (3, 1–5)

3 (2,1–5)

0.005

 

Self-assessment of the preference for sanctity vs. quality of life1 (Scale 1–5)

3 (1, 1–5)

3 (2, 1–5)

5 (1, 2–5)

4 (1, 1–5)

< 0.001

 
  1. aPercentages represent the proportion within each country. Different categories may thus have different percentage due to missing data
  2. b Internal Medicine, General Surgery, Pediatrics
  3. Note: 1higher rating on this scale indicates preference for quality of life
  4. Decimal values greater than or equal to 0.5 were rounded to the closest whole higher value. Decimal values less than 0.5 were rounded to the closest whole lower value